Fullständig referenslista:

1. Eneslatt M. Dying to talk : methods and tools for conversations about dying, death and advance end-of-life care planning. PhD. Karolinska Institutet; 2021.  

2. Eneslätt M, Helgesson G, Tishelman C. Exploring Community-Dwelling Older Adults’ Considerations About Values and Preferences for Future End-of-Life Care: A Study from Sweden. Gerontologist. Oct 2020;60(7):1332-1342. doi:10.1093/geront/gnaa012 

3. Eneslätt M, Helgesson G, Tishelman C. Dissemination, use, and impact of a community-based, conversational advance care planning intervention: ripple effects of the Swedish DöBra cards. Palliative Care and Social Practice. 2021;15:263235242110329. doi:10.1177/26323524211032983 

4. Eneslätt M, Helgesson G, Tishelman C. Same, same, but different? A longitudinal, mixed-methods study of stability in values and preferences for future end-of-life care among community-dwelling, older adults. Bmc Palliat Care. Sep 22 2021;20(1)doi:ARTN 148 


5. Johansson T. A ’new public health’ perspective on building competence for end-of-life care and communication: How death literacy can be developed and measured. Doctoral Thesis. Karolinska Institutet; 2022.  

6. Johansson T, Tishelman C, Cohen J, Eriksson LE, Goliath I. Continuums of Change in a Competence-Building Initiative Addressing End-of-Life Communication in Swedish Elder Care. Qual Health Res. Aug 2021;31(10):1904-1917. doi:10.1177/10497323211012986 

7. Johansson T, Tishelman C, Eriksson LE, Cohen J, Goliath I. Use, usability, and impact of a card-based conversation tool to support communication about end-of-life preferences in residential elder care – a qualitative study of staff experiences. BMC Geriatrics. 2022;22(1)doi:10.1186/s12877-022-02915-w 

8. Kleijberg M. Studio DöBra–Creating spaces for engaging with end-of-life issues and interacting across generations through community-based arts activities. Karolinska Institutet; 2021.  

9. Kleijberg M. Increasing community support and preventing involuntary loneliness among older LGBTQ people in Sweden – A participatory action research project. Unpublished grant proposal 2021. 

10. Kleijberg M, Ahlberg BM, Hilton R, Tishelman C. Death, loss and community—Perspectives from children, their parents and older adults on intergenerational community‐based arts initiatives in Sweden. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2020;28(6):2025-2036. doi:10.1111/hsc.13014 

11. Kleijberg M, Ahlberg BM, Macdonald A, Lindqvist O, Tishelman C. Navigating power dynamics in engaging communities in end-of-life issues – Lessons learned from developing community-based intergenerational arts initiatives about death and loss. Death Stud. Oct 11 2019:1-14. doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1671547 

12. Kleijberg M, Hilton R, Ahlberg BM, Tishelman C. Conceptualizing impact in community-based participatory action research to engage communities in end-of-life issues. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022;16:26323524221095107. doi:10.1177/26323524221095107 

13. Kroik L, Eneslätt M, Tishelman C, Stoor K, Edin‐Liljegren A. Values and preferences for future end‐of‐life care among the indigenous Sámi. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2022;36(2):504-514. doi:10.1111/scs.13047 

14. Kroik L, Tishelman C, Stoor K, Edin-Liljegren A. A Salutogenic Perspective on End-of-Life Care among the Indigenous Sami of Northern Fennoscandia. Healthcare (Basel). Jun 19 2021;9(6)doi:10.3390/healthcare9060766 

15. Lindqvist O, Tishelman C. Going public: reflections on developing the DoBra research program for health-promoting palliative care in Sweden. Prog Palliat Care. Jan 2 2016;24(1):19-24. doi:10.1080/09699260.2015.1103497 

16. Tishelman C, Eneslatt M, Menkin E, Lindqvist O. Developing and using a structured, conversation-based intervention for clarifying values and preferences for end-of-life in the advance care planning-naive Swedish context: Action research within the DoBra research program. Death Stud. Dec 20 2019:1-13. doi:10.1080/07481187.2019.1701145 

17. Westerlund C, Tishelman C, Benkel I, et al. Public awareness of palliative care in Sweden. Scand J Public Health. Jun 2018;46(4):478-487. doi:10.1177/1403494817751329 

18. Kaunis Iron. Mind-dig. Accessed 2024-01-10, 2024.  

19. Hjort E. Marginalisation through the eyes of the othered: Young adults choosing to live in rural Northern Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies. 2023;97:601-609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.011 

20. Statistics Sweden. Kommuner i siffror; Pajala. Accessed 2024-01, 2024.  

21. Wikipedia. Pajala. Accessed 20240110, 2024.  

22. Kommun P. Pajala kommun Befolkningsstatistik 2020-12-31. 2022.  

23. Drygt två miljoner utrikes födda i Sverige – fler än någonsin tidigare.  

24. Alm F. Green industry makes Swedish Luleå try to grow three times faster. Nordic Labour Journal. 2022. 20220526. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/i-fokus/in-focus-2022/theme-the-reindustrialisation-of-norrbotten/article.2022-05-24.5413118720 

25. Wallin G. Green transition brings big industry to northern Sweden. Nordic Labour Journal. 2021. 20210429. Accessed 20230211. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/i-fokus/in-focus-2021/theme-the-green-transition/article.2021-04-26.5217781263 

26. Iron K. We take responsibility. Accessed 20240110, 2024.  

27. Carson DB, Jonsson F. A socially accountable health and care workforce in Northern Sweden : who should it contain, who is it for and what should it do? In: Linda Lundmark DBCME, ed. Dipping in to the North : living, working and traveling in sparsely populated areas. Palgrave Macmillan; 2020:175-194. 

28. Carson DB, Schoo A, Berggren P. The ‘rural pipeline’ and retention of rural health professionals in Europe’s northern peripheries. Health Policy. 2015/12/01/ 2015;119(12):1550-1556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.001 

29. Norrlandstingen. Vård och omsorg i glesbygd. 2014. http://glesbygdsmedicin.info/Landsting/vard%20o%20omsorgsinriktn%20ing.pdf 

30. Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment adn Planning. 2006;38:207-226.  

31. Cresswell T, Dorow S, Roseman S. Putting mobility theory to work: Conceptualizing employment-related geographical mobility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2016;48(9):1787-1803. doi:10.1177/0308518×16649184 

32. Dorow S, Roseman SR, Cresswell T. Re‐working mobilities: Emergent geographies of employment‐related mobility. 2017;11(12):e12350. doi:10.1111/gec3.12350 

33. Newman D. The Geography of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects . Tim Creswell and Peter Merriman, editors. Urban Geography. 2012;33(8):1249-1251. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.33.8.1249 

34. Sheller M. The new mobilities paradigm för a live sociology. Current Sociology Review. 2014;62(6):789-811.  

35. Sheller M. From spatial turn to mobilities turn. Current Sociology. 2017/07/01 2017;65(4):623-639. doi:10.1177/0011392117697463 

36. Gorman-Murray A, Bissell D. Mobile work, multilocal dwelling and spaces of wellbeing. Article. Health Place. May 2018;51:232-238. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.04.004 

37. Hirschman AO. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press; 1970:155. 

38. Holt-Lunstad J, Perissinotto C. Social Isolation and Loneliness as Medical Issues. N Engl J Med. Jan 19 2023;388(3):193-195. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2208029 

39. Holt-Lundstad J. Social Isolation And Health. Health Affairs Health Policy Brief. 2020;(20200621)doi:10.1377/hpb20200622.253235 

40. Holt-Lunstad J. Fostering Social Connection in the Workplace. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2018;32(5):1307-1312. doi:10.1177/0890117118776735a 

41. Holt-Lunstad J. The Major Health Implications of Social Connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2021;30(3):251-259. doi:10.1177/0963721421999630 

42. Holt-Lunstad J. A pandemic of social isolation? World Psychiatry. Feb 2021;20(1):55-56. doi:10.1002/wps.20839 

43. Holt-Lunstad J. Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors: The Power of Social Connection in Prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2021;15(5):567-573. doi:10.1177/15598276211009454 

44. Holt-Lunstad J. Social Connection as a Public Health Issue: The Evidence and a Systemic Framework for Prioritizing the “Social” in Social Determinants of Health. Annual Review of Public Health. 2022;43(1):193-213. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052020-110732 

45. Holt-Lunstad J. Positive Social Connection: A Key Pillar of Lifestyle Medicine. J Fam Pract. Jan 2022;71(Suppl 1 Lifestyle):S38-S40. doi:10.12788/jfp.0245 

46. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. Jul 27 2010;7(7):e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 

47. Zavaleta D, Samuel K, Mills C. Social Isolation: A Conceptual and Measurement Proposal. 2014. OPHI Working Papers  

48. Zavaleta D, Samuel K, Mills CT. Measures of Social Isolation. Social Indicators Research. 2017;doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1252-2 

49. Advisory: the healing effects of social connection. (Office of the Surgeon General) 82 (2023). 

50. Rameshbabu A, Hudson H. Social Connection and Worker Well-being. NIOSH Science Blog blog. November 20, 2023, 2023.  

51. Badcock JC, Holt-Lunstad J, Bombaci P, Garcia E, Lim MH., (GILC) ftGIoLaC. Position Statements on Addressing Social Isolation, Loneliness, and the Power of Human Connection GILC. Accessed Jan 1, 2024, 2024.  

52. Mills J, Abel J, Kellehear A, et al. The role and contribution of compassionate communities. The Lancet. 2023/10/13/ 2023;doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02269-9 

53. Vanderstichelen S, Dury S, De Gieter S, et al. Researching Compassionate Communities From an Interdisciplinary Perspective: The Case of the Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise. Gerontologist. Nov 30 2022;62(10):1392-1401. doi:10.1093/geront/gnac034 

54. Bakker AB, E. D. Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol 2017;22(3):273-285. doi:10.1037/ocp0000056 

55. Yang Y, Yan R, Li X, Meng Y, Xie G. Different Results from Varied Angles: The Positive Impact of Work Connectivity Behavior After-Hours on Work Engagement. Behavioral Sciences. 2023;13(12):971. doi:10.3390/bs13120971 

56. Peters SE, Dennerlein JT, Wagner GR, Sorensen G. Work and worker health in the post-pandemic world: a public health perspective. The Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e188-e194. doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00259-0 

57. Ding R, Gafni A, Williams A. Cost Implications from an Employer Perspective of a Workplace Intervention for Carer-Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(4):2194. doi:10.3390/ijerph19042194 

58. Van Goethem V, Dierickx S, Deliens L, De Vleminck A, Lapeire L, Cohen J. Size and characteristics of family caregiving for people with serious illness: A population-based survey. Palliative and Supportive Care. 2022:1-10. doi:10.1017/s1478951522001079 

59. Hospice UK. Compassionate Employers Workplace Support. Accessed 20230220, 2023. https://www.hospiceuk.org/compassionate-employers 

60. Ekman B, McKee K, Vicente J, Magnusson L, Hanson E. Cost analysis of informal care: estimates from a national cross-sectional survey in Sweden. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1)doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07264-9 

61. Vicente J, McKee KJ, Magnusson L, Johansson P, Ekman B, Hanson E. Informal care provision among male and female working carers: Findings from a Swedish national survey. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0263396. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263396 

62. whatworkswellbeing.org. Working with terminal illness: what is known and what is needed: Experience of terminal illness in working-age people: a review of the literature and a survey of HR professionals. 2022.  

63. Wang L, Williams A, Kitchen P. Health of caregiver-employees in Canada. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2018;11(6):382-394. doi:10.1108/ijwhm-04-2018-0043 

64. Wilson DM, Punjani S, Song Q, Low G. A Study to Understand the Impact of Bereavement Grief on the Workplace. Omega (Westport). Jun 2021;83(2):187-197. doi:10.1177/0030222819846419 

65. Wilson DP, Rodriguez-Prat AP, Low GP. The potential impact of bereavement grief on workers, work, careers, and the workplace. Soc Work Health Care. Jul 2020;59(6):335-350. doi:10.1080/00981389.2020.1769247 

66. AFA. Allvarliga arbets skador  och långvarig sjukfrånvaro 2023.  

67. Commission E. Socio-economic costs of accidents at work and work-related ill health. 2011:55.  

68. Umberson D, Donnelly R. Social Isolation: An Unequally Distributed Health Hazard. Annual Review of Sociology. 2023;49(1):379-399. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-012001 

69. National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine, . Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. The National Academies Press; 2020. 

70. Lorenz F, Whittaker L, Tazzeo J, Williams A. Availability of caregiver-friendly workplace policies: an international scoping review follow-up study. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2021;14(4):459-476. doi:10.1108/ijwhm-10-2019-0136 

71. Ding R, Dardas A, Wang L, Williams A. Improving the Workplace Experience of Caregiver-Employees: A Time-Series Analysis of a Workplace Intervention. Safety and Health at Work. 2021/09/01/ 2021;12(3):296-303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.12.003 

72. Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods. Sage; 2009. 

73. Gomm R, Hammersley M, Foster P, eds. Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. Sage; 2000. 

74. Coghlan D, Holian R. Insider Action Research for Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review. 2023;22(2):173-179. doi:10.1177/15344843231162245 

75. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):157 pp.  

76. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications; 2017. 

77. Priya A. Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociological Bulletin. 2021;70(1):94-110. doi:10.1177/0038022920970318 

78. Bradbury H. Introduction: How to situate and define action research, . In: Bradbury H, ed. The Sage Handbook of Action Research. 3 ed. Sage; 2015:769. 

79. TT news agency. Så blev gruvkommunen Pajala flyktingkommun (how the mining municipality of Pajala became a refugee municipality). Svenska Dagbladet2016. 

80. Akay PA, Ahmadi N. The Work Environment of Immigrant Employees in Sweden—a Systematic Review. Journal of International Migration and Integration. 2022;23(4):2235-2268. doi:10.1007/s12134-021-00931-0 

81. Carlbaum S. Temporality and space in highly skilled migrants’ experiences of education and work in the rural north of Sweden. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2021;40(5-6):485-498. doi:10.1080/02601370.2021.1984325 

82. Carlbaum S. Refugee women’s establishment in the rural north of Sweden: cultural capital in meeting local labour market needs. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2022;48(5):1210-1227. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2021.1933402 

83. Dorow S, Hilario C, O’Leary V. ”It goes with the job”: Gender, stress, and fly-in fly out/drive-in drive out wrok. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2023;16:101338. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101338 

84. Heu LC, van Zomeren M, Hansen N. Far away from home and (not) lonely: Relational mobility in migrants’ heritage culture as a potential protection from loneliness. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2020/07/01/ 2020;77:140-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.05.005 

85. Straughan ER, Bissell D, Gorman-Murray A. Friends disconnected: How mobile work transforms friendships through absence and presence. Area. 2021;53(1):13-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12659 

86. Arbetsmiljöverket. Organisatorisk och social arbetsmiljö Arbetsmiljöverkets föreskrifter om organisatorisk och social arbetsmiljö samt allmänna råd om tillämpningen av föreskrifterna. In: Arbetsmiljöberket, editor. AFS 2015:42015. p. 12. 

87. Lundqvist D, Fogelberg Eriksson A, Ekberg K. Managers social support: Facilitators and hindrances for seeking support at work. Work. 2018;59(3):351-365.  

88. Cayrat C, Boxall P.   33 (4). The roles of the HR function: A systematic review of tensions, continuity and change. Human Resource Management Review. 2023;33(4):100984 doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100984 

89. Farquhar J, Michels N, Robson J. Triangulation in industrial qualitative case study research: Widening the scope. Industrial Marketing Management. 2020;87:160-170. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.001 

90. Thorne S. Intepretative Description. Second Edition ed. Routledge; 2016:316. 

91. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O’Flynn-Magee K. The Analytic Challenge in Interpretive Description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2004;3(1):1-11. doi:10.1177/160940690400300101 

92. Short KG. Critical content analysis as a research methodology. In: Johnson H., Mathis J., G. SK, eds. Critical content analysis of children’s and young adult literature: Reframing perspective Routledge; 2017:1-15. 

93. McVicar A, Munn‐Giddings C, Seebohm P. Workplace stress interventions using participatory action research designs. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2013;6(1):18-37. doi:10.1108/17538351311312303 

94. Flum MR, Siqueira CE, DeCaro A, al. e. Photovoice in the workplace: A participatory method to give voice to workers to identify health and safety hazards and promote workplace change—a study of university custodians. American journal of industrial medicine. 2010;53:1150-1158.  

95. Schouw D, Mash R, T. K-A. Transforming the workplace environment to prevent non-communicable chronic diseases: participatory action research in a South African power plant. . Globa Health Action. 2018;11(1544336-10) 

96. Washburn LT, Traywick L, Thornton L, Vincent J, Brown T. Using Ripple Effects Mapping to Evaluate a Community-Based Health Program: Perspectives of Program Implementers. Health promotion practice. 2018:1524839918804506. doi:10.1177/1524839918804506 

97. Saldana J. Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing change through time. Altamira Press; 2003. 

98. Lewis K, Ewers T, Bird M, Wilkins T. Engage Stakeholders in Program Evaluation: Throw Them a Party! Journal of Extension. 2019;57(4)doi:10.34068/joe.57.04.15 

99. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass; 1987. 

100. Paparini S, Green J, Papoutsi C, et al. Case study research for better evaluations of complex interventions: rationale and challenges. BMC Medicine. 2020;18(1)doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01777-6 

101. OECD. Time for Better Care at the End of Life. 2023. 

102. Sallnow L, Smith R, Ahmedzai SH, et al. Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life. The Lancet. 2022;doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02314-x 

103. Cornwall A. Unpacking ’Participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal. 2008;43:269-283.  

104. Källström L, Smith E. Participation unpacked: participants’ perceptions of its meaning and scope. Baltic Journal of Management. 2023;19(6):1-19. doi:10.1108/bjm-10-2022-0365 

105. London School of Economics and Political Science. Introduction to Knowledge Exchange adn Public Engagement: What it is and why should you do it? Accessed 20240113, 2024.  

106. Ciesielski TH, Aldrich MC, Marsit CJ, Hiatt RA, Williams SM. Transdisciplinary approaches enhance the production of translational knowledge. Translational Research. 2017;182:123-134. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2016.11.002 

107. Fritz L, Binder CR. Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. European Journal of Futures Research. 2020;8(1)doi:10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4 

108. Lahsen M, Turnhout E. How norms, needs, and power in science obstruct transformations towards sustainability. Environmental Research Letters. 2021;16(2):025008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abdcf0 

109. Luthe T. Success in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research. Sustainability. 2017;9(1):71. doi:10.3390/su9010071 

110. Malcolm J, Tully V, Lim C, Mountain R. Moving beyond an interdisciplinary paradigm. The Design Journal. 2019;22(sup1):475-486. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1595433 

111. Gott M, Morgan T, Williams L. Gender and palliative care: a call to arms. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2020;14:2632352420957997. doi:10.1177/2632352420957997 

112. Morgan T, Ann Williams L, Trussardi G, Gott M. Gender and family caregiving at the end-of-life in the context of old age: A systematic review. Palliat Med. Jul 2016;30(7):616-24. doi:10.1177/0269216315625857 

113. Maynard K, Ilagan C, Sethi B, Williams A. Gender-based analysis of working-carer men: a North American scoping review. International Journal of Care and Caring. 01 Feb. 2018 2018;2(1):27-48. doi:10.1332/239788218×15187914567891 

114. Maynard K, Williams A, Ilagan C. Male working carers: a qualitative analysis of males involved in caring alongside full-time paid work. International Journal of Care and Caring. 01 Aug. 2019 2019;3(3):425-444. doi:10.1332/239788219×15488381886344 

115. Abrahamsson L, Johansson J. Can new technology challenge macho-masculinities? The case of the mining industry. Mineral Economics. 2021;34(2):263-275. doi:10.1007/s13563-020-00221-8 

116. Torres S. Expanding the gerontological imagination on ethnicity: conceptual and theoretical perspectives. Ageing and Society. 2015;35(5):935-960. doi:10.1017/s0144686x14001330 

117. Kemmis S, R. M. Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3 ed. Sage; 2005: 559-603. 

118. Teglund A, Herolf J. Åker hem–och ställer den ’förbjudna’ frågan (Return home–and ask the forbidden question). Svenska Dagbladet. 2024. 20240112. doi:https://www.svd.se/a/onqxjW/staller-forbjudna-fragan-om-industrisatsningen-i-norrbotten  

119. Kristensen CJ. Research ethics and organizations: The neglected ethics of organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography. 2023;12(2):242-253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-11-2022-0031