1.         Verdery AM, Smith-Greenaway E, Margolis R, et al. Tracking the reach of COVID-19 kin loss with a bereavement multiplier applied to the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020;117(30):17695-17701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007476117.

2.         Peters SE, Dennerlein JT, Wagner GR, et al. Work and worker health in the post-pandemic world: a public health perspective. The Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e188-e194. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00259-0.

3.         Ding R, Gafni A, Williams A. Cost Implications from an Employer Perspective of a Workplace Intervention for Carer-Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(4):2194. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042194.

4.         Van Goethem V, Dierickx S, Deliens L, et al. Size and characteristics of family caregiving for people with serious illness: A population-based survey. Palliative and Supportive Care. 2022:1-10. doi: 10.1017/s1478951522001079.

5.         Hospice UK. Compassionate Employers Workplace Support 2023 [cited 2023 20230220]. Available from: https://www.hospiceuk.org/compassionate-employers

6.         Ekman B, McKee K, Vicente J, et al. Cost analysis of informal care: estimates from a national cross-sectional survey in Sweden. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07264-9.

7.         Kleijberg M. Studio DöBra–Creating spaces for engaging with end-of-life issues and for interacting across generations through community-based arts activities [PhD]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2021.

8.         Westerlund C, Tishelman C, Benkel I, et al. Public awareness of palliative care in Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jan 1:1403494817751329. doi: 10.1177/1403494817751329. PubMed PMID: 29301481.

9.         World Health Organization. The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva1986.

10.       Stjernsward J. Palliative care: the public health strategy. J Public Health Policy. 2007;28(1):42-55. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200115. PubMed PMID: 17363935.

11.       Kellehear A. Health-promoting palliative care: developing a social model for practice. Mortality. 1999;4(1):75-82.

12.       Rumbold B. A history of public health palliative care. In: Abel J, Kellehear A, editors. Oxford Textbook of Public Health Palliative Care. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press; 2022. p. 41-51.

13.       Kellehear A. Compassionate Cities: Public health and end-of-life care. London: Routledge; 2005.

14.       Quintiens B, D’Eer L, Deliens L, et al. Area-Based Compassionate Communities: A systematic integrative review of existing initiatives worldwide. Palliative Medicine. 2022;36(3):422-442. doi: 10.1177/02692163211067363. PubMed PMID: 35354413.

15.       Barry V, Patel M. An Overview of Compassionate Communities in England. West Midlands, England: Murray Hall Community Trust and National Council for Palliative Care Dying Matters; 2013. p. 95.

16.       D’Eer L, Quintiens B, Van Den Block L, et al. Civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss: A systematic mixed-methods review. Palliative Medicine. 2022:026921632210778. doi: 10.1177/02692163221077850.

17.       The Groundswell Project Australia. The compasssionate workplace 2023 [20230221]. Available from: https://www.thegroundswellproject.com/compassion-at-work

18.       Pallium Canada. Compassionate Workplace Campaign​ 2023 [20230221]. Available from: https://www.pallium.ca/cwc/

19.       Good Life GD, Good Grief,. Scottish Compassionate Communities Toolkit: Supportive Workplaces [20230221]. Available from: https://www.goodlifedeathgrief.org.uk/content/toolkit_workplaces/

20.       Johansson J, Johansson B, Lööw J, et al. Attracting young people to the mining industry: six recommendations. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering. 2018;9(2):94-108. doi: 10.1504/ijmme.2018.091967.

21.       Lind M. Attraktiv arbetsgivare i den norra tillväxtregionen. Affärstidningen Näringsliv. 2023 [cited. https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/affaerstidningen-naeringsliv/pressreleases/attraktiv-arbetsgivare-i-den-norra-tillvaextregionen-3231903

22.       Alm F. Green industry makes Swedish Luleå try to grow three times faster. Nordic Labour Journal. 2022 [cited. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/i-fokus/in-focus-2022/theme-the-reindustrialisation-of-norrbotten/article.2022-05-24.5413118720

23.       Wallin G. Green transition brings big industry to northern Sweden. Nordic Labour Journal. 2021 [cited. http://www.nordiclabourjournal.org/i-fokus/in-focus-2021/theme-the-green-transition/article.2021-04-26.5217781263

24.       Carson DB, Jonsson F. A socially accountable health and care workforce in Northern Sweden : who should it contain, who is it for and what should it do? In: Linda Lundmark DBCME, editor. Dipping in to the North : living, working and traveling in sparsely populated areas. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. p. 175-194.

25.       Carson DB, Schoo A, Berggren P. The ‘rural pipeline’ and retention of rural health professionals in Europe’s northern peripheries. Health Policy. 2015 2015/12/01/;119(12):1550-1556. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.001.

26.       Norrlandstingen. Vård och omsorg i glesbygd. 2014.

27.       Carlbaum S. Temporality and space in highly skilled migrants’ experiences of education and work in the rural north of Sweden. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2021;40(5-6):485-498. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2021.1984325.

28.       Rosvall P-Å, Carlbaum S, Benerdal M. Globalisation in Swedish rural areas: organisation of adult education and transitions to work for immigrants in times of depopulation. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2022;20(5):718-730. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2021.2013165.

29.       Carlbaum S. Refugee women’s establishment in the rural north of Sweden: cultural capital in meeting local labour market needs. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2022;48(5):1210-1227. doi: 10.1080/1369183x.2021.1933402.

30.       Sacco LB, König S, Westerlund H, et al. Informal Caregiving and Quality of Life Among Older Adults: Prospective Analyses from the Swedish Longitudinal Occupational Survey of Health (SLOSH). Social Indicators Research. 2022;160(2-3):845-866. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02473-x.

31.       Bradbury H. Introduction: How to situate and define action research. In: Bradbury H, editor. The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Third Edition ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage; 2015. p. 769.

32.       Kleijberg M, Hilton R, Ahlberg BM, et al. Conceptualizing impact in community-based participatory action research to engage communities in end-of-life issues. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022;16:26323524221095107. doi: 10.1177/26323524221095107. PubMed PMID: 35573090; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9092577.

33.       Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, et al. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):157 pp. PubMed PMID: 11785749; eng.

34.       Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. N.Y:: The Guilford Press; 2011.

35.       Laycock A, Bailie J, Matthews V, et al. Using developmental evaluation to support knowledge translation: reflections from a large-scale quality improvement project in Indigenous primary healthcare. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2019;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0474-6.

36.       Preskill H, Beer T. Evaluating Social Innovation. Washington, DC: FSG and Center for Evaluation Innovation; 2012.

37.       Grindrod A. Choice depends on options: A public health framework incorporating the social determinants of dying to create options at end of life. Progress in Palliative Care. 2020;28(2):94-100. doi: 10.1080/09699260.2019.1705539.

38.       Patel M, Noonan K. Chapter 11. Community Development. Compassionate Communities. In: Abel J, Kellehear A, editors. Oxford Textbook of Public Health Palliative Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022. p. 107-116.

39.       Kroik L, Stoor K, Anette EL, et al. Using narrative analysis to explore traditional Sami knowledge through storytelling about End-of-Life. Health Place. 2020 Sep;65:102424. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102424. PubMed PMID: 32877866.

40.       McDonald S. Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research. Qualitative Research. 2005;5(4):455-473. doi: 10.1177/1468794105056923.

41.       Sangaramoorthy T, Kroeger K. Rapid Ethnographic Assessments: A Practical Approach and Toolkit for Collaborative Community Research N.Y.: Routledge; 2020.

42.       Thorne S. Intepretative Description. Second Edition ed. NYC: Routledge; 2016.

43.       Cassetti V, Powell K, Barnes A, et al. A systematic scoping review of asset-based approaches to promote health in communities: development of a framework. Global health promotion. 2019:1757975919848925. doi: 10.1177/1757975919848925.

44.       Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass; 1987.

45.       Affifi R, Christie B. Facing loss: pedagogy of death. Environmental Education Research. 2019;25(8):1143-1157. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1446511.

46.       Corr CA, Corr DM. Death Education. 2003 2023/03/10. In: Handbook of Death & Dying [Internet]. Thousand Oaks

Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Available from: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/death.

47.       Vargo ME, Batsel WM. The reduction of death anxiety: a comparison of didactic, experiential and non-conscious treatments. Br J Med Psychol. 1984 Dec;57 ( Pt 4):333-7. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1984.tb02598.x. PubMed PMID: 6394044.

48.       Wass H. A PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT STATE OF DEATH EDUCATION. Death Stud. 2004;28(4):289-308. doi: 10.1080/07481180490432315.

49.       Johansson T. A ’new public health’ perspective on building competence for end-of-life care and communication: How death literacy can be developed and measured [Doctoral Thesis]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2022.

50.       Mier-Alpaño JD, Cruz JRB, Fajardo MS, et al. Facilitating learning exchange and building a community of practice to accelerate social innovation in health. BMJ Innovations. 2022;8(3):155-160. doi: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000882.

51.       Aljuwaiber A. Communities of practice as an initiative for knowledge sharing in business organisations: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2016;20(4):731-748. doi: 10.1108/jkm-12-2015-0494.

52.       Trickett EJ, Beehler S. Participatory action research and impact: an ecological ripples perspective. Educational Action Research. 2017 2017/08/08;25(4):525-540. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1299025.

53.       Dart J, Davies R. A dialogical, story-based evaluation tool: The most significant change technique. American Journal of Evaluation. 2003 Sum;24(2):137-155. PubMed PMID: WOS:000184276100001; English.

54.       Serrat O. The Most Significant Change Technique.  Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. p. 35-38.

55.       Willetts J, Crawford P. The most significant lessons about the Most Significant Change technique. Development in Practice. 2007;17(3):367-379. doi: 10.1080/09614520701336907.

56.       Wilson V. Research Methods: The Most Significant Change Technique Evidence-based Library and Information practice. 2016 2016-03-04;11(1(S)):72-74. doi: 10.18438/b8z90j.

57.       The ’Most Significant Change’ (MSC) Technique. A guide to its use [Internet]. 2005. Available from: https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/mscguide.pdf.

58.       Hardy LJ, Hulen E, Shaw K, et al. Ripple effect: An evaluation tool for increasing connectedness through community health partnerships. Action Research. 2018;16(3):299-318. doi: 10.1177/1476750316688512.

59.       Chazdon S, Emery M, Hansen D, et al. A Field Guide to Ripple Effects Mapping. Program Evaluation Series. 1 ed. Minneapolis Minnesota: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Evaluation Studies Institute (MESI); 2017. p. 202.

60.       Emergy M, Higgins L, Chazdon S, et al. Using Ripple Effect Mapping to Evaluate Program Impact: Choosing or combining the methods that work best for you. Journal of Extension. 2015;53(2):article #2 TOT1.

61.       Kollock DH, Flage L, Chazdon S, et al. Ripple effect mapping: A ”Radiant” way to capture program impacts. Journal of Extension. 2012 01/01;50.

62.       Washburn LT, Traywick L, Thornton L, et al. Using Ripple Effects Mapping to Evaluate a Community-Based Health Program: Perspectives of Program Implementers. Health promotion practice. 2018:1524839918804506. doi: 10.1177/1524839918804506.

63.       Welborn R, Downey L, Dyk PH, et al. Turning the Tide on Poverty: Documenting impacts through Ripple Effect Mapping. Community Development. 2016;47(3):385-402. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2016.1167099.

64.       Eneslätt M. DÖSNACK: Metoder och verktyg för samtal om döende, död och framtida vård i livets slutskede. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2021.

65.       Eneslätt M, Helgesson G, Tishelman C. Dissemination, use, and impact of a community-based, conversational advance care planning intervention: ripple effects of the Swedish DöBra cards. Palliative Care and Social Practice. 2021;15:263235242110329. doi: 10.1177/26323524211032983.

66.       Kleijberg M, Ahlberg BM, Macdonald A, et al. Navigating power dynamics in engaging communities in end-of-life issues – Lessons learned from developing community-based intergenerational arts initiatives about death and loss. Death Stud. 2019 Oct 11:1-14. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1671547. PubMed PMID: 31604379.

67.       Alexius S, Sardiello T. Förpliktigande samspel som vardagsrutin – en fallstudie av Borlänge kommun. In: Bringselius L, editor. Styra och leda med tillit. Forskning och praktik. . Stockholm: SOU; 2018.